When That Which is Perfect Is Come

“Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away. For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.” (1 Cor. 13:8–10)

---

I. Establishing the Argument: What Is “the Perfect”?

The entire interpretive debate hinges on the referent of τὸ τέλειον (to teleion) — “that which is perfect.” Three major views compete:

• The Second Coming of Christ
• The Millennial/Kingdom Age
• The Completion of the New Testament Canon (the cessationist position)

The third view is exegetically, contextually, and theologically the strongest.

---

II. The Case for Canonical Completion

A. The Neuter Gender Is Decisive

Τὸ τέλειον is neuter, not masculine or feminine. This is not a minor grammatical detail — it is the starting point of sound interpretation.

• If Paul intended to refer to Christ at His Second Coming, the natural and expected form would be a masculine noun or pronoun. Christ is consistently referred to with masculine pronouns and titles throughout the NT.
• If Paul intended to refer to the Kingdom as a geo-political or eschatological event, one might expect a more specific term (βασιλεíα, which is feminine).
• The neuter points to a thing, not a person — something brought to completion, a body of revelation made whole.

The word teleion carries the meaning of completeness, maturity, full measure — something that has reached its intended end. Paul uses the same root in v. 11 when describing the transition from childhood to manhood, illustrating the movement from partial to complete.

B. The Contrast of “In Part” Points to Revelatory Gifts Specifically

Paul frames the argument as a contrast between partial and complete revelation:

“For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.” (vv. 9–10)

The “in part” (ἐκ μέρους) refers specifically to knowledge and prophecy — two of the three gifts listed in v. 8. These are revelatory gifts — gifts that communicated divine truth. The gifts were partial because the revelation was not yet complete. The logical corollary: when the revelation reached completion, the partial means by which it was delivered would be unnecessary.

This is precisely what happened. Tongues, prophecy, and supernatural knowledge were instruments for delivering and confirming revelation during the apostolic age — before the canon was closed. Once the canon was sealed, the scaffolding came down.

C. The Mirror Illustration (v. 12) Fits Written Revelation

“For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.”

Some argue this verse proves “the perfect” must be the Second Coming, since “face to face” implies seeing Christ. But notice:

• The glass (ἔσοπτρον, a polished metal mirror) in the first century was dim and indirect — a fitting metaphor for partial written revelation still in progress.
• “Face to face” is an idiomatic expression for direct, clear knowledge — not necessarily a literal vision of Christ. Compare God speaking to Moses “face to face” (Ex. 33:11; Num. 12:8) — a clarity of communication, not a beatific vision.
• The point is the contrast between obscure, piecemeal revelation and complete, clear revelation — exactly what the finished canon provides.

D. Paul’s Own Developmental Language Supports This

In v. 11, Paul uses the analogy of childhood and adulthood:

“When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.”

The church was in its infancy during the apostolic period. The sign gifts were the tools of a young, growing revelation. When the body of revealed truth matured into its full form (the completed NT), the church put away the partial instruments of childhood. This is not about Christ returning; it is about the church’s revelatory maturity.

E. Hebrews 1:1–2 Establishes the Completed Revelation Framework

“God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son…”

The writer of Hebrews establishes that the final and complete word has been delivered in Christ and, by extension, in the apostolic witness. Jude 3 reinforces this:

“…the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.”

“Once delivered” (ḁπαξ παραδοθείσῃ) — once for all, entirely, completely delivered. This is the language of a closed and finished body of truth, not ongoing revelation.

F. The Function of Sign Gifts in Acts Confirms Their Transitional Nature

The sign gifts served a specific, bounded purpose:

• Tongues were a sign to unbelieving Israel (1 Cor. 14:21–22, quoting Isa. 28:11–12) — a judicial sign that God was turning to the Gentiles.
• Prophecy and knowledge were revelatory bridges, filling in the body of doctrine until the apostolic writings were complete.
• Hebrews 2:3–4 places the confirmation of these gifts squarely in the apostolic, foundational era: “…confirmed unto us by them that heard him; God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders…” — past tense, foundational, not ongoing.

The sign gifts were tied to a specific transitional, foundational era — and once that foundation was laid and the revelation codified, their purposes were fulfilled.

---

III. Refuting the Second Coming View

The Argument: “The perfect refers to Christ’s return, because only then will we know fully (v. 12) and see ‘face to face.’ The gifts therefore continue until the rapture or second coming.”

1. The grammar won’t allow it.

As shown above, τὸ τέλειον is neuter. A reference to the personal return of Christ would demand masculine gender. This is not a minor point — it is a fundamental rule of Greek grammar. To force a personal referent onto a neuter noun requires special pleading.

2. It creates a theological absurdity.

If the gifts continue until the Second Coming, then every generation of the church — including generations with no access to the NT — would need ongoing prophecy and tongues to receive divine revelation. This effectively undermines the sufficiency and finality of Scripture.

3. The “face to face” argument is culturally overread.

“Face to face” is a Hebraic idiom for clear, direct communication — used of Moses and God when God spoke words, not granted a vision. To insist it can only mean the literal return of Christ is to impose a wooden literalism where the text employs an idiom.

4. The analogy of vv. 9–10 is about revelation, not glorification.

The “in part” refers to knowing and prophesying in part — revelatory activity. The “perfect” that ends the partial is therefore a completion of revelation, not a completion of redemptive history.

---

IV. Refuting the Kingdom/Millennial View

The Argument: Some hold that “the perfect” refers to the establishment of the Millennial Kingdom, when Christ reigns and full knowledge is restored to the earth (cf. Isa. 11:9).

1. It still violates the neuter gender.

Whether one refers to Christ’s reign or to the Kingdom as an age, the specific referent of τὸ τέλειον as a thing brought to completion does not fit a geopolitical or eschatological era without contextual support — and Paul provides none.

2. It leaves the church age without a resolution.

If the gifts don’t cease until the Kingdom, then the church has been in a perpetual state of partial revelation since Pentecost, with no completed revelation available. This is theologically untenable — the church does have the completed word of God.

3. The context is ecclesiological, not eschatological.

Paul is addressing the function of gifts within the local church body (chapters 12–14). The “perfect” fits naturally as the completion of what the church needs for its function — i.e., the completed Scriptures — rather than a future geopolitical event with no contextual connection.

---

V. Summary of the Case

Question	Canonical Completion	Second Coming View	Kingdom View
Fits neuter gender?	✓ Yes — a completed thing	✗ No — Christ is masculine	✗ Weak
Fits “in part” contrast?	✓ Partial → complete revelation	✗ Forces glorification reading	✗ No resolution for church age
Consistent with Jude 3?	✓ Faith once delivered	✗ Implies ongoing revelation	✗ Implies ongoing revelation
Consistent with Heb. 2:3–4?	✓ Gifts tied to apostolic era	✗ Extends gifts indefinitely	✗ Extends gifts indefinitely
Preserves Scripture’s sufficiency?	✓ Fully	✗ Undermines it	✗ Undermines it

---

Conclusion

The most exegetically honest reading of 1 Corinthians 13:8–10 is that “the perfect” refers to the completed canon of Scripture. The neuter gender of τὸ τέλειον, the context of partial versus complete revelation, the developmental analogy of childhood and manhood, the mirror illustration, and the broader NT witness of Jude 3 and Hebrews 2:3–4 all converge on this conclusion.

The sign gifts were transitional instruments given to the early church during the revelatory formation of the NT. They served their God-ordained purpose in confirming the apostolic message and delivering divine truth during a period of incomplete revelation. When the canon was complete — when “that which is perfect” had come — the partial means were set aside, just as a lamp is no longer needed when the sun has risen.

The Second Coming and Kingdom views, by contrast, require the abandonment of natural grammatical reading, the undermining of scriptural sufficiency, and the imposition of foreign eschatological contexts onto an ecclesiological passage. They cannot bear the weight of honest exegesis.

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be throughly furnished unto all good works.” (2 Tim. 3:16–17)

— throughly furnished: the perfect is come.